By Abigail Watson Author’s Note: This article was first published on Future Foreign Policy on August 8, 2016. The Chilcot Report may have been written with a focus on the conventional methods of war used in Iraq; however, the government must heed its warnings as the UK becomes ever more reliant on covert, remote means […]Read more "Britain Must Heed Chilcot’s Lessons for Remote Warfare"
By Abigail Watson This article was first published on Think Defence on August 10 2016. As President Barack Obama’s administration releases its once-secret guidance on kill and capture operations against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities, the UK must look to improve its own transparency. On Saturday, the Obama administration released a redacted version […]Read more "Terrorist Targets Outside of Active Hostilities – The UK Position?"
By Abigail Watson This article was originally published on Defence Report on 3 August 2016. Russia’s recent bombing of a Syrian base used by UK and US Special Forces exposes the flaws with the UK’s blanket “no comment” approach. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has recently revealed that, in June, a Russian aircraft targeted a […]Read more "The UK Can’t Stay ‘Mum’ Over Russian Bombing of Special Forces Base in Syria"
Islamic State (IS) has used aerial drones for reconnaissance and battlefield intelligence in Iraq and Syria and has attempted to use aerial and ground drones with explosive payloads to attack Kurdish troops. IS-directed or -inspired attacks in Australia, Canada, Denmark, the United States and France and failed or foiled attacks elsewhere, including the United Kingdom, have demonstrated the group’s desire to attack targets outside the Middle East. Given that threat is a function of capability and intent, should we therefore be concerned about the possibility of Islamic State or another terrorist group using drones to attack Western cities?Read more "How to respond to the threat from hostile drones in the UK"
Ever advancing remote warfare technology is being increasingly used by law enforcement agencies to counter drug trafficking. In response, drug cartels are also adopting new technology to smuggle and distribute drugs. However, the technological superiority of law enforcement-military actors is also causing criminal and militant groups to adapt by employing the very opposite tactic, by resorting to highly primitive technology and methods. In turn, society is doing the same thing, adopting its own back-to-the-past response to drug trafficking and crime.Read more "Drugs and drones: The Crime Empire strikes back"
In Latin America drones are being used as part of the War on Drugs as both regional governments and the US are using surveillance drones to monitor drug trafficking and find smuggling routes. However, as drones are increasingly being used by drug cartels themselves to transport drugs between countries, could Latin America find itself at the forefront of emerging drone countermeasures?Read more "From surveillance to smuggling: Drones in the War on Drugs"
US drug policy has become increasingly privatised in recent years as the US government contracts private military and security companies (PMSCs) to provide intelligence, logistical support and training to state security forces in drug-producing and –transit states. As the cases of Colombia and Mexico illustrate, this privatisation strategy is having a damaging impact on these already fragile environments.Read more "Privatising the War on Drugs: PMSCs in Colombia and Mexico"